The UN Security Council is made up of representatives from fifteen different nations, coming either from the
five permanent members of the Security Council, the UK, the US, Russia, China and France, or from the ten temporary members of the Security Council, which are elected every two years-the position for which Australia is currently campaigning from the beginning of 2013 to the end of 2014. These non-permanent nations don't hold veto power over resolutions the way the permanent members do, but they still have significant power in voting on and participating in discussion of resolutions.
Examples[]
- That Australia should have a security council seat
- That we should campaign for a security council seat
Context[]
Australia was last on the security council in 1986, so there has been a reasonable period of time between campaigns. Its opponents for the 2013-2014 seat are Finland and Luxemburg, as (rather oddly) we're considered part of the 'Western Europe and others' region. Australia has been a major contributor to UN campaigns, as the Affirmative will argue, but the cost of the bid has been quite high, with Kevin Rudd estimating another $120 million will have to be spent campaigning for the seat, and further costs in contributions to the UN.
Cases[]
Affirmative | Negative |
---|---|
1.1-Principle Argument-Merits of Australia for a security council seat:
|
1.1-Unnecessary Argument-Our interests are already represented as:
|
1.2-Practical Argument-Benefits to Australia:
|
1.2-Practical Argument-Diplomatic Tensions results because:
|
1.3-Principle Argument-Australia being on the Security Council will mean better decisions as:
|
1.3-Principle Argument-having Australia on the security council is likely to mean more poor decisions as:
|
2.1-Practical Argument-Campaigning in itself is valuable, as it leads to increased discussion with and links to other nations with which we may not have interacted were it not for the security council bid. |
2.1-Practical Argument-The cost to taxpayers:
|
2.2-Practical Argument-Shows our ongoing support for the UN so that we are more respected internationally. | 2.2-Practical Argument-Australia is seen as a proxy of the UK and the US by other nations, and will be disliked for attempting to gain a seat on the Security Council. |
Issues[]
In this debate, a 3rd speaker will usually discuss:
- The effects on UN decision-making
- Whether Australia deserves a Security Council Seat
- The effects on Australia